Perazon
How Perazon voted in 2009
170 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 48.24% 82 votes |
+26.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 16.47% 28 votes |
+4.8 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 10.00% 17 votes |
+0.1 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 8.24% 14 votes |
−14.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 5.29% 9 votes |
−3.2 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 4.71% 8 votes |
+1.4 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 2.35% 4 votes |
−0.5 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 1.76% 3 votes |
−2.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זך | גיל – גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 1.18% | 2 | +0.7 |
| פ | כח להשפיע | 0.59% | 1 | +0.5 |
| צי | צבר – מפלגת הצעירים של ישראל | 0.59% | 1 | +0.4 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.59% | 1 | +0.2 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Perazon voted for גיל – גימלאי ישראל לכנסת. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.18% here, 2.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.52%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
172 voters out of 284 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Perazon against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Perazon
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 333 | 243 | 73.0% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 342 | 237 | 69.3% | +1.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 290 | 216 | 74.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 320 | 240 | 75.0% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 319 | 227 | 71.2% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 302 | 228 | 75.5% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 298 | 198 | 66.4% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 284 | 172 | 60.6% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 188 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 270 | 144 | 53.3% | −12.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.