Sede Terumot
How Sede Terumot voted in 2019
256 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 77.73% 199 votes |
+51.3 |
| כ כולנו הימין השפוי בראשות משה כחלון | 5.08% 13 votes |
+1.5 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 2.73% 7 votes |
−23.4 |
| טב איחוד מפלגות הימין הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי- עוצמה יהודית | 2.34% 6 votes |
−1.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 2.34% 6 votes |
−3.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.39% 1 votes |
−5.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נר | גשר בראשות אורלי לוי אבקסיס | 5.86% | 15 | +4.1 |
| ז | זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין | 1.95% | 5 | −0.8 |
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 1.17% | 3 | −2.0 |
| ףנ | שווים | 0.39% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
15 people in Sede Terumot voted for גשר בראשות אורלי לוי אבקסיס. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 5.86% here, 3.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.73%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
257 voters out of 363 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Sede Terumot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Sede Terumot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 387 | 293 | 75.7% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 368 | 249 | 67.7% | +0.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 369 | 267 | 72.4% | +0.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 364 | 240 | 65.9% | −3.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 363 | 257 | 70.8% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 341 | 231 | 67.7% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 324 | 179 | 55.2% | −12.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 316 | 176 | 55.7% | −6.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 151 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 318 | 208 | 65.4% | −0.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.