Te'ashur
How Te'ashur voted in 2022
223 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 28.25% 63 votes |
+4.8 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 26.46% 59 votes |
+8.7 |
| כן National Unity | 16.14% 36 votes |
+7.1 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 13.45% 30 votes |
+2.6 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 4.93% 11 votes |
+1.2 |
| שס Shas | 2.24% 5 votes |
−6.0 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 0.90% 2 votes |
−2.9 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 0.45% 1 votes |
−5.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 4.04% | 9 | +0.9 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 1.35% | 3 | +1.1 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 1.35% | 3 | +1.0 |
| אצ | חופש כלכלי בראשות אביר קארה | 0.45% | 1 | +0.1 |
What happened to these votes
9 people in Te'ashur voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.04% here, 1.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
223 voters out of 309 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Te'ashur against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Magshimim · Talme El'azar · Hazeva
10 elections in Te'ashur
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 309 | 223 | 72.2% | +1.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 288 | 191 | 66.3% | −1.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 292 | 192 | 65.8% | −5.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 288 | 201 | 69.8% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 292 | 211 | 72.3% | +3.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 244 | 176 | 72.1% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 241 | 163 | 67.6% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 218 | 156 | 71.6% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 154 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 207 | 142 | 68.6% | +3.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.