Giv'at Hen
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as גבעת חן
How Giv'at Hen voted in 2015
249 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 64.66% 161 votes |
+46.0 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 10.84% 27 votes |
+2.0 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 8.03% 20 votes |
+4.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.23% 18 votes |
−16.2 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 4.42% 11 votes |
−3.1 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 2.41% 6 votes |
−4.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.40% 1 votes |
−4.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.80% | 2 | −0.3 |
| נז | אחריות – לב אחד ורוח חדשה | 0.40% | 1 | +0.4 |
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.40% | 1 | −2.6 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.40% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
252 voters out of 299 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Giv'at Hen against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Mash'abbe Sade · Yotvata · Bazra
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Mash'abbe Sade | 317 |
| Yotvata | 404 |
| Bazra | 553 |
| Ofer | 311 |
| Sharona | 346 |
| Ma'ale HaHamisha | 349 |
| Dvir | 398 |
| HaYogev | 432 |
10 elections in Giv'at Hen
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 285 | 235 | 82.5% | +11.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 296 | 243 | 82.1% | +14.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 301 | 249 | 82.7% | +11.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 303 | 251 | 82.8% | +13.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 297 | 257 | 86.5% | +18.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 299 | 252 | 84.3% | +11.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 310 | 262 | 84.5% | +16.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 308 | 243 | 78.9% | +16.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 233 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 267 | 212 | 79.4% | +13.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.