Kefar HaMakkabbi
How Kefar HaMakkabbi voted in 2003
176 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 64.77% 114 votes |
+50.3 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 13.64% 24 votes |
+1.4 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 9.66% 17 votes |
+4.4 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 7.95% 14 votes |
−21.4 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 0.57% 1 votes |
−7.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 2.27% | 4 | +1.1 |
| קץ | ל.ה.ב.ה | 0.57% | 1 | +0.5 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.57% | 1 | +0.2 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Kefar HaMakkabbi voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.27% here, 1.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
177 voters out of 267 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kefar HaMakkabbi against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Deganya Alef · Nir Dawid (Tel Amal) · Enat
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Deganya Alef | 317 |
| Nir Dawid (Tel Amal) | 410 |
| Enat | 369 |
| Ga'ash | 343 |
| En Shemer | 398 |
| Yuvallim | 522 |
| Gazit | 412 |
| Yagur | 777 |
10 elections in Kefar HaMakkabbi
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 323 | 235 | 72.8% | +2.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 316 | 219 | 69.3% | +1.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 307 | 215 | 70.0% | −1.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 307 | 212 | 69.1% | −0.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 305 | 216 | 70.8% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 289 | 200 | 69.2% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 286 | 198 | 69.2% | +1.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 264 | 177 | 67.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 175 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 267 | 177 | 66.3% | +0.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.