Bet Yosef
How Bet Yosef voted in 2022
268 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 57.46% 154 votes |
+34.1 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 22.01% 59 votes |
+11.2 |
| שס Shas | 9.33% 25 votes |
+1.1 |
| כן National Unity | 6.34% 17 votes |
−2.7 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 1.87% 5 votes |
−15.9 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 1.12% 3 votes |
−2.6 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 0.37% 1 votes |
−5.5 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.37% 1 votes |
−4.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 0.75% | 2 | −2.4 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.37% | 1 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
269 voters out of 369 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Bet Yosef against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Hasidim Alef · Ma'ale Gilboa · Elishama
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Hasidim Alef | 379 |
| Ma'ale Gilboa | 309 |
| Elishama | 640 |
| Sha'alvim | 662 |
| Newe Yamin | 701 |
| Ta'oz | 343 |
| Avigedor | 483 |
| Sede Ya'aqov | 522 |
10 elections in Bet Yosef
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 369 | 269 | 72.9% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 366 | 213 | 58.2% | −9.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 367 | 251 | 68.4% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 366 | 245 | 66.9% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 357 | 257 | 72.0% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 323 | 195 | 60.4% | −12.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 321 | 180 | 56.1% | −11.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 290 | 172 | 59.3% | −3.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 168 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 281 | 184 | 65.5% | −0.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.