Usha
How Usha voted in 2019
261 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 63.98% 167 votes |
+38.0 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 12.26% 32 votes |
+7.5 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 11.11% 29 votes |
+6.8 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.90% 18 votes |
−18.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.68% 7 votes |
−4.3 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.15% 3 votes |
−9.4 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 0.77% 2 votes |
−5.1 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.38% 1 votes |
−5.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.77% | 2 | −1.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
261 voters out of 373 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Usha against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: En Iron · Bar'am · Shave Ziyyon
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| En Iron | 330 |
| Bar'am | 366 |
| Shave Ziyyon | 614 |
| Hilla | 341 |
| Tal Shahar | 615 |
| Yif'at | 625 |
| Bene Atarot | 495 |
| Yuvallim | 768 |
10 elections in Usha
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 403 | 289 | 71.7% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 382 | 276 | 72.3% | +4.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 368 | 260 | 70.7% | −0.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 373 | 261 | 70.0% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 363 | 269 | 74.1% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 343 | 248 | 72.3% | −0.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 337 | 232 | 68.8% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 324 | 212 | 65.4% | +2.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 204 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 311 | 219 | 70.4% | +4.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.