Newe Etan
How Newe Etan voted in 2019
117 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 45.30% 53 votes |
+19.4 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 26.50% 31 votes |
+21.7 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 11.97% 14 votes |
+7.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.69% 9 votes |
−17.4 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 3.42% 4 votes |
−2.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.56% 3 votes |
−4.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.71% 2 votes |
−5.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.85% | 1 | +0.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
117 voters out of 186 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Newe Etan against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sede Nehemya · Kinneret(Qevuza) · Yehi'am
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sede Nehemya | 575 |
| Kinneret(Qevuza) | 439 |
| Yehi'am | 365 |
| Ashdot Ya'aqov(Ihud) | 476 |
| Bahan | 448 |
| Mishmar HaNegev | 523 |
| Misgav Dov | 387 |
| Zova | 402 |
10 elections in Newe Etan
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 190 | 119 | 62.6% | −8.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 184 | 108 | 58.7% | −8.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 191 | 125 | 65.4% | −6.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 186 | 117 | 62.9% | −7.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 188 | 122 | 64.9% | −3.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 229 | 141 | 61.6% | −10.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 212 | 133 | 62.7% | −5.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 215 | 141 | 65.6% | +3.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 126 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 199 | 144 | 72.4% | +6.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.