Gesher
How Gesher voted in 2019
248 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 46.37% 115 votes |
+20.4 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 29.44% 73 votes |
+24.6 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 10.08% 25 votes |
+5.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.87% 22 votes |
−16.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.42% 6 votes |
−4.6 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.61% 4 votes |
−9.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.40% | 1 | +0.1 |
| יז | אדום לבן - לגליזציה לקנביס, שוויון לאתיופים, ערבים ומקופחים | 0.40% | 1 | +0.3 |
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.40% | 1 | −1.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
250 voters out of 416 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Gesher against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Netiv HaLamed-He · En Dor · Or HaNer
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Netiv HaLamed-He | 349 |
| En Dor | 575 |
| Or HaNer | 472 |
| Dan | 407 |
| Yaqum | 418 |
| Mezer | 314 |
| Gan Shemu'el | 684 |
| Yodefat | 462 |
10 elections in Gesher
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 405 | 251 | 62.0% | −8.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 403 | 253 | 62.8% | −4.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 413 | 261 | 63.2% | −8.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 416 | 250 | 60.1% | −9.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 418 | 267 | 63.9% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 420 | 281 | 66.9% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 440 | 295 | 67.0% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 454 | 302 | 66.5% | +4.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 302 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 424 | 284 | 67.0% | +1.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.