Kefar Glikson
How Kefar Glikson voted in 2019
214 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 50.47% 108 votes |
+24.5 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 21.03% 45 votes |
+16.7 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 16.36% 35 votes |
+11.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 5.14% 11 votes |
−20.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.74% 8 votes |
−3.3 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 1.40% 3 votes |
−4.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.93% | 2 | +0.6 |
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.93% | 2 | −0.9 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
214 voters out of 282 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kefar Glikson against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Hogla · Nahsholim · Kefar Yedidya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Hogla | 401 |
| Nahsholim | 416 |
| Kefar Yedidya | 394 |
| Kabri | 610 |
| Ruhama | 347 |
| Gevat | 559 |
| Mishmeret | 495 |
| Sede Nehemya | 575 |
10 elections in Kefar Glikson
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 291 | 207 | 71.1% | +0.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 287 | 220 | 76.7% | +9.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 284 | 214 | 75.4% | +3.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 282 | 214 | 75.9% | +6.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 279 | 214 | 76.7% | +8.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 260 | 194 | 74.6% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 263 | 190 | 72.2% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 271 | 189 | 69.7% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 183 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 271 | 201 | 74.2% | +8.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.