Newe Yam
How Newe Yam voted in 2020
158 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 44.30% 70 votes |
+17.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 37.97% 60 votes |
+8.5 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 10.13% 16 votes |
+4.3 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 3.80% 6 votes |
−1.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.27% 2 votes |
−4.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.27% 2 votes |
−6.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 1.27% | 2 | +0.8 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Newe Yam voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.27% here, 3.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.42%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
158 voters out of 210 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Newe Yam against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Talme Yehi'el · Rannen · Kefar Hittim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Talme Yehi'el | 469 |
| Rannen | 316 |
| Kefar Hittim | 344 |
| Nir Yafe | 325 |
| Even Sappir | 349 |
| Bustan HaGalil | 550 |
| Talme Yafe | 371 |
| Kefar Bialik | 336 |
10 elections in Newe Yam
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 211 | 155 | 73.5% | +2.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 210 | 153 | 72.9% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 210 | 158 | 75.2% | +3.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 209 | 162 | 77.5% | +7.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 211 | 154 | 73.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 205 | 163 | 79.5% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 219 | 162 | 74.0% | +6.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 175 | 128 | 73.1% | +10.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 116 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 149 | 106 | 71.1% | +5.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.