Bet Oren
How Bet Oren voted in 2020
207 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 60.39% 125 votes |
+33.8 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 24.15% 50 votes |
+18.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 10.63% 22 votes |
−18.8 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 1.93% 4 votes |
−3.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.48% 1 votes |
−5.5 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.48% 1 votes |
−12.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.48% 1 votes |
−5.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | עוצמה ליברלית – כלכלית בראשות גלעד אלפר | 0.48% | 1 | +0.4 |
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.48% | 1 | +0.1 |
| קך | סדר חדש לשינוי שיטת הבחירות בראשות עו"ד אביטל אופק | 0.48% | 1 | +0.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
208 voters out of 321 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Bet Oren against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Mordekhay · Bazra · Ma'yan Zevi
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Mordekhay | 362 |
| Bazra | 571 |
| Ma'yan Zevi | 478 |
| Lavon | 333 |
| Tel Adashim | 650 |
| Kefar Netter | 564 |
| Sharona | 345 |
| Nirit | 644 |
10 elections in Bet Oren
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 358 | 229 | 64.0% | −6.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 338 | 224 | 66.3% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 321 | 208 | 64.8% | −6.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 307 | 205 | 66.8% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 302 | 198 | 65.6% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 280 | 193 | 68.9% | −3.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 268 | 171 | 63.8% | −4.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 268 | 157 | 58.6% | −3.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 153 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 237 | 126 | 53.2% | −12.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.