Gelil Yam
How Gelil Yam voted in 2020
275 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 60.00% 165 votes |
+33.4 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 28.00% 77 votes |
+22.2 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.64% 10 votes |
−25.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 2.91% 8 votes |
−4.8 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 2.55% 7 votes |
−10.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.45% 4 votes |
−4.3 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 1.09% 3 votes |
−4.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.36% | 1 | −0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
275 voters out of 352 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gelil Yam against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Hadar Am · Nir Yizhaq · Ginnosar
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Hadar Am | 412 |
| Nir Yizhaq | 360 |
| Ginnosar | 370 |
| Bet Nir | 343 |
| Yad Hanna | 457 |
| Nezer Sereni | 503 |
| En Shemer | 427 |
| Afiqim | 731 |
10 elections in Gelil Yam
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 362 | 279 | 77.1% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 353 | 276 | 78.2% | +10.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 352 | 275 | 78.1% | +6.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 348 | 264 | 75.9% | +6.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 346 | 273 | 78.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 318 | 271 | 85.2% | +12.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 309 | 246 | 79.6% | +11.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 284 | 213 | 75.0% | +12.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 209 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 255 | 181 | 71.0% | +5.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.