Menara
How Menara voted in 2009
123 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 52.85% 65 votes |
+42.9 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 28.46% 35 votes |
+6.0 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 9.76% 12 votes |
+6.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.25% 4 votes |
−8.4 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 1.63% 2 votes |
−20.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 3.25% | 4 | +2.4 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.81% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Menara voted for התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.25% here, 4.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.82%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
125 voters out of 200 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Menara against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Hanan · Dafna · En HaShofet
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Hanan | 353 |
| Dafna | 393 |
| En HaShofet | 487 |
| Sarid | 420 |
| Yaqum | 376 |
| Mishmar HaEmeq | 591 |
| Ma'anit | 340 |
| Amir | 336 |
10 elections in Menara
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 213 | 139 | 65.3% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 210 | 147 | 70.0% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 212 | 142 | 67.0% | −4.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 212 | 151 | 71.2% | +1.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 213 | 146 | 68.5% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 215 | 138 | 64.2% | −8.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 216 | 152 | 70.4% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 200 | 125 | 62.5% | −0.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 130 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 234 | 146 | 62.4% | −3.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.