Bet Zeid
How Bet Zeid voted in 2015
68 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 60.29% 41 votes |
+41.6 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 11.76% 8 votes |
+7.8 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 11.76% 8 votes |
+2.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.35% 5 votes |
−16.0 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 5.88% 4 votes |
−1.6 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.47% 1 votes |
−4.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ף | הפיראטים - הפתק הלבן | 1.47% | 1 | +1.4 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Bet Zeid voted for הפיראטים - הפתק הלבן. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.47% here, 69.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.02%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
68 voters out of 108 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Bet Zeid against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Hefzi-Bah · Gan Shelomo · Ne'ot Mordekhay
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Hefzi-Bah | 303 |
| Gan Shelomo | 301 |
| Ne'ot Mordekhay | 340 |
| Newe Mivtah | 333 |
| Giv'at Nili | 333 |
| En Hod | 336 |
| Hannaton | 332 |
| Nahshon | 304 |
7 elections in Bet Zeid
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 108 | 69 | 63.9% | −6.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 112 | 64 | 57.1% | −10.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 113 | 74 | 65.5% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 114 | 74 | 64.9% | −5.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 113 | 70 | 61.9% | −6.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 108 | 68 | 63.0% | −9.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 108 | 52 | 48.1% | −19.6 | The results → |