Almog
How Almog voted in 2021
125 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 27.20% 34 votes |
+21.1 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 22.40% 28 votes |
+8.5 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 13.60% 17 votes |
+7.0 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 11.20% 14 votes |
+6.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 10.40% 13 votes |
−13.8 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 9.60% 12 votes |
+3.4 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 2.40% 3 votes |
−2.2 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 1.60% 2 votes |
−3.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ני | עולם חדש בראשות יורם אדרי | 0.80% | 1 | +0.8 |
| ר | רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני | 0.80% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
125 voters out of 189 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Almog against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Mordekhay · Giv'at HaShelosha · Gan Yoshiyya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Mordekhay | 361 |
| Giv'at HaShelosha | 417 |
| Gan Yoshiyya | 514 |
| Gal'on | 326 |
| Bet Lehem HaGelilit | 458 |
| Nizzanim | 308 |
| HaYogev | 451 |
| Kefar Bialik | 328 |
10 elections in Almog
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 195 | 111 | 56.9% | −13.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 189 | 125 | 66.1% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 193 | 135 | 69.9% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 198 | 128 | 64.6% | −5.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 194 | 136 | 70.1% | +1.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 145 | 105 | 72.4% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 140 | 104 | 74.3% | +6.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 118 | 94 | 79.7% | +17.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 63 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 76 | 49 | 64.5% | −1.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.