Tomer
How Tomer voted in 2019
205 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 45.37% 93 votes |
+19.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 28.78% 59 votes |
+3.7 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 8.29% 17 votes |
+3.5 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 7.32% 15 votes |
+1.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 5.85% 12 votes |
−1.1 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 1.95% 4 votes |
−2.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.98% 2 votes |
−5.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.98% | 2 | +0.6 |
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.49% | 1 | −1.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
206 voters out of 249 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tomer against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ezer · Kefar Daniyyel · Ganne Yohanan
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ezer | 489 |
| Kefar Daniyyel | 369 |
| Ganne Yohanan | 403 |
| Talme El'azar | 503 |
| Emunim | 541 |
| Talme Yehi'el | 453 |
| Magshimim | 527 |
| Bet Uzzi'el | 336 |
10 elections in Tomer
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 254 | 197 | 77.6% | +6.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 249 | 198 | 79.5% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 246 | 189 | 76.8% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 249 | 206 | 82.7% | +12.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 252 | 209 | 82.9% | +14.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 243 | 177 | 72.8% | +0.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 242 | 182 | 75.2% | +7.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 240 | 164 | 68.3% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 150 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 205 | 134 | 65.4% | −0.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.