Horeshim
How Horeshim voted in 2015
184 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 37.50% 69 votes |
+18.8 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 28.26% 52 votes |
+24.3 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 14.13% 26 votes |
+5.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.61% 14 votes |
−15.8 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 6.52% 12 votes |
−0.2 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 2.17% 4 votes |
−5.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.09% 2 votes |
−4.0 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.54% 1 votes |
−4.4 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 0.54% 1 votes |
−10.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נז | אחריות – לב אחד ורוח חדשה | 0.54% | 1 | +0.5 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.54% | 1 | −0.6 |
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.54% | 1 | −2.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
184 voters out of 273 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Horeshim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Lehem HaGelilit · Yif'at · Nirit
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Lehem HaGelilit | 439 |
| Yif'at | 552 |
| Nirit | 774 |
| Bat Hen | 398 |
| Lohame HaGeta'ot | 345 |
| Nir Zevi | 693 |
| Hulda | 431 |
| Nir Yisra'el | 439 |
10 elections in Horeshim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 307 | 208 | 67.8% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 298 | 199 | 66.8% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 296 | 196 | 66.2% | −5.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 294 | 198 | 67.3% | −2.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 289 | 196 | 67.8% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 273 | 184 | 67.4% | −4.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 264 | 171 | 64.8% | −3.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 250 | 159 | 63.6% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 134 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 232 | 147 | 63.4% | −2.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.