Rehan
How Rehan voted in 2015
99 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 29.29% 29 votes |
+10.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 20.20% 20 votes |
−3.2 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 18.18% 18 votes |
+11.4 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 11.11% 11 votes |
+2.3 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 8.08% 8 votes |
+0.6 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 4.04% 4 votes |
+0.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 8.08% | 8 | +7.0 |
| ףץ | Unsourced | 1.01% | 1 | +1.0 |
What happened to these votes
8 people in Rehan voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 8.08% here, 7.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
100 voters out of 131 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Rehan against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ramat HaShofet · Talme El'azar · Bet She'arim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ramat HaShofet | 494 |
| Talme El'azar | 433 |
| Bet She'arim | 408 |
| Mishmar HaNegev | 490 |
| Deganya Alef | 366 |
| Erez | 302 |
| Deganya Bet | 404 |
| Allonim | 403 |
10 elections in Rehan
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 242 | 186 | 76.9% | +6.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 220 | 174 | 79.1% | +11.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 207 | 156 | 75.4% | +3.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 198 | 151 | 76.3% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 192 | 155 | 80.7% | +12.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 131 | 100 | 76.3% | +4.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 120 | 89 | 74.2% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 112 | 78 | 69.6% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 60 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 88 | 47 | 53.4% | −12.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.