Massu'a
How Massu'a voted in 2019
95 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 35.79% 34 votes |
+10.7 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 27.37% 26 votes |
+1.4 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 21.05% 20 votes |
+15.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 10.53% 10 votes |
+3.5 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 4.21% 4 votes |
−0.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 1.05% | 1 | −0.8 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Massu'a voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.05% here, 0.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.88%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
95 voters out of 150 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Massu'a against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Truman · Bet Neqofa · Yanuv
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Truman | 465 |
| Bet Neqofa | 368 |
| Yanuv | 474 |
| Hulata | 332 |
| Ilaniyya | 310 |
| Giv'at Nili | 329 |
| Amminadav | 470 |
| Merhavya(Moshav) | 424 |
10 elections in Massu'a
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 212 | 158 | 74.5% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 157 | 110 | 70.1% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 155 | 105 | 67.7% | −3.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 150 | 95 | 63.3% | −6.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 150 | 101 | 67.3% | −1.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 132 | 97 | 73.5% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 134 | 97 | 72.4% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 136 | 86 | 63.2% | +0.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 81 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 140 | 85 | 60.7% | −4.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.