Gilgal
How Gilgal voted in 2003
64 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 34.38% 22 votes |
+5.0 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 31.25% 20 votes |
+16.8 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 23.44% 15 votes |
+11.2 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 6.25% 4 votes |
+1.0 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 1.56% 1 votes |
−2.6 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 1.56% 1 votes |
−4.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 1.56% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Gilgal voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.56% here, 1.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
64 voters out of 104 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gilgal against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: HaGosherim · Kokhav Mikha'el · Bet Hanan
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| HaGosherim | 307 |
| Kokhav Mikha'el | 311 |
| Bet Hanan | 320 |
| Bet Lehem HaGelilit | 312 |
| Timmorim | 316 |
| Ashdot Ya'aqov(Ihud) | 316 |
| Kefar HaNasi | 304 |
| Bet She'arim | 313 |
10 elections in Gilgal
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 158 | 94 | 59.5% | −11.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 162 | 88 | 54.3% | −13.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 155 | 91 | 58.7% | −12.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 152 | 89 | 58.6% | −11.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 147 | 86 | 58.5% | −10.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 132 | 82 | 62.1% | −10.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 122 | 70 | 57.4% | −10.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 110 | 64 | 58.2% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 68 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 104 | 64 | 61.5% | −4.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.