Mizpe Shalem
How Mizpe Shalem voted in 2015
110 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 55.45% 61 votes |
+36.8 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 10.91% 12 votes |
+2.1 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 8.18% 9 votes |
+0.7 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 8.18% 9 votes |
+4.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.27% 8 votes |
−16.1 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 4.55% 5 votes |
−2.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.73% 3 votes |
−2.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 2.73% | 3 | +1.6 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Mizpe Shalem voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.73% here, 2.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
110 voters out of 151 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Mizpe Shalem against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Shilat · Kefar HaHoresh · Reshafim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Shilat | 351 |
| Kefar HaHoresh | 331 |
| Reshafim | 310 |
| Deganya Bet | 404 |
| Allonim | 403 |
| Bet She'arim | 408 |
| Erez | 302 |
| Nahsholim | 407 |
10 elections in Mizpe Shalem
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 265 | 191 | 72.1% | +1.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 264 | 191 | 72.3% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 251 | 187 | 74.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 235 | 178 | 75.7% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 173 | 125 | 72.3% | +3.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 151 | 110 | 72.8% | +0.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 145 | 105 | 72.4% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 127 | 91 | 71.7% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 73 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 120 | 83 | 69.2% | +3.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.