Beqa'ot
How Beqa'ot voted in 2009
93 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 39.78% 37 votes |
+17.3 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 33.33% 31 votes |
+11.7 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 10.75% 10 votes |
+0.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 6.45% 6 votes |
−5.2 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 2.15% 2 votes |
−1.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 2.15% 2 votes |
−6.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 1.08% 1 votes |
−3.3 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 1.08% 1 votes |
−1.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | ישראל המתחדשת בראשות מיכאל נודלמן | 1.08% | 1 | +1.0 |
| צי | צבר – מפלגת הצעירים של ישראל | 1.08% | 1 | +0.9 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 1.08% | 1 | +0.7 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Beqa'ot voted for ישראל המתחדשת בראשות מיכאל נודלמן. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.08% here, 14.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.08%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
93 voters out of 143 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Beqa'ot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Pedaya · Hosen · מעלה שומרון
10 elections in Beqa'ot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 145 | 104 | 71.7% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 144 | 101 | 70.1% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 140 | 104 | 74.3% | +2.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 139 | 108 | 77.7% | +7.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 136 | 113 | 83.1% | +14.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 142 | 115 | 81.0% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 147 | 111 | 75.5% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 143 | 93 | 65.0% | +2.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 87 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 128 | 82 | 64.1% | −1.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.