Ruhama
How Ruhama voted in 2013
309 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מרץ מרצ - השמאל של ישראל | 44.34% 137 votes |
+39.8 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 30.74% 95 votes |
+19.4 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 10.03% 31 votes |
−4.3 |
| צפ התנועה בראשות ציפי לבני | 4.85% 15 votes |
−0.1 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 3.56% 11 votes |
−5.6 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.91% 9 votes |
−20.4 |
| כן הישראלים | 1.62% 5 votes |
−0.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | ארץ חדשה – החזית להפלת שלטון ההון בראשות אלדד יניב ורני בלייר | 0.65% | 2 | −0.1 |
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 0.65% | 2 | −1.1 |
| זך | דור בוני הארץ בראשות אפרים לפיד | 0.32% | 1 | +0.2 |
| רק | הירוקים והצעירים לעתיד ירוק בישראל | 0.32% | 1 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
310 voters out of 462 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Ruhama against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Gan HaShomeron · Tal Shahar · Hogla
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Gan HaShomeron | 442 |
| Tal Shahar | 491 |
| Hogla | 357 |
| Ge'alya | 624 |
| Moledet | 519 |
| Meshar | 356 |
| HaSolelim | 433 |
| En Yahav | 372 |
10 elections in Ruhama
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 550 | 367 | 66.7% | −3.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 521 | 368 | 70.6% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 502 | 354 | 70.5% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 502 | 347 | 69.1% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 498 | 350 | 70.3% | +1.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 457 | 305 | 66.7% | −5.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 462 | 310 | 67.1% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 446 | 299 | 67.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 284 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 435 | 271 | 62.3% | −3.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.