Ma'on
How Ma'on voted in 2021
206 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 80.10% 165 votes |
+75.0 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 14.08% 29 votes |
+7.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.40% 7 votes |
−20.8 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 0.49% 1 votes |
−13.4 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 0.49% 1 votes |
−4.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ר | רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני | 1.46% | 3 | +1.1 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Ma'on voted for רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.46% here, 3.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.39%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
206 voters out of 300 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ma'on against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Hemed · Rehelim · Kefar HaRo'e
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Hemed | 494 |
| Rehelim | 308 |
| Kefar HaRo'e | 579 |
| Newe Mikha'el | 337 |
| Telamim | 419 |
| Sede Ilan | 319 |
| Ahisamakh | 684 |
| Tene | 396 |
10 elections in Ma'on
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 305 | 228 | 74.8% | +4.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 300 | 206 | 68.7% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 301 | 215 | 71.4% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 299 | 220 | 73.6% | +3.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 296 | 237 | 80.1% | +11.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 259 | 204 | 78.8% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 236 | 170 | 72.0% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 192 | 151 | 78.6% | +16.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 131 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 125 | 106 | 84.8% | +19.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.