Telem
How Telem voted in 2003
30 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 66.67% 20 votes |
+37.3 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 10.00% 3 votes |
+4.5 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 6.67% 2 votes |
−7.8 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 6.67% 2 votes |
+4.5 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 3.33% 1 votes |
−4.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זנ | אהבת ישראל בנשיאות גדול המקובלים הרב כדורי | 6.67% | 2 | +6.5 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Telem voted for אהבת ישראל בנשיאות גדול המקובלים הרב כדורי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 6.67% here, 38.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.17%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
30 voters out of 48 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Telem against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Yagel · En Harod (Ihud) · Ahisamakh
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Yagel | 335 |
| En Harod (Ihud) | 382 |
| Ahisamakh | 419 |
| Biriyya | 341 |
| Hazav | 413 |
| Zetan | 404 |
| Pattish | 361 |
| Sede Uzziyyahu | 447 |
10 elections in Telem
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 230 | 181 | 78.7% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 215 | 156 | 72.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 205 | 164 | 80.0% | +8.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 212 | 221 | 104.2% | +34.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 210 | 195 | 92.9% | +24.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 134 | 100 | 74.6% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 126 | 95 | 75.4% | +7.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 90 | 69 | 76.7% | +14.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 58 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 48 | 30 | 62.5% | −3.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.