Yizhar
How Yizhar voted in 2019
536 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב איחוד מפלגות הימין הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי- עוצמה יהודית | 86.38% 463 votes |
+82.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.99% 16 votes |
−23.5 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.68% 9 votes |
−4.1 |
| כ כולנו הימין השפוי בראשות משה כחלון | 0.37% 2 votes |
−3.2 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 0.19% 1 votes |
−4.3 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 0.19% 1 votes |
−25.9 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.19% 1 votes |
−5.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין | 5.78% | 31 | +3.0 |
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 2.05% | 11 | −1.2 |
| ףץ | נ נח - הרשימה הממלכתית - תרימו את הראש | 0.19% | 1 | +0.2 |
What happened to these votes
31 people in Yizhar voted for זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 5.78% here, 2.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.74%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
538 voters out of 659 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Yizhar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Yizhar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 830 | 645 | 77.7% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 737 | 566 | 76.8% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 684 | 529 | 77.3% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 664 | 536 | 80.7% | +10.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 659 | 538 | 81.6% | +13.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 539 | 448 | 83.1% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 500 | 391 | 78.2% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 402 | 289 | 71.9% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 232 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 197 | 153 | 77.7% | +12.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.