Migdalim
How Migdalim voted in 2009
51 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 43.14% 22 votes |
+21.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 33.33% 17 votes |
+21.6 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 13.73% 7 votes |
−8.7 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 7.84% 4 votes |
+4.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 1.96% | 1 | +1.1 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Migdalim voted for התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.96% here, 2.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.82%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
51 voters out of 91 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Migdalim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Hosen · Petahya · מעלה שומרון
10 elections in Migdalim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 297 | 226 | 76.1% | +5.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 273 | 204 | 74.7% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 247 | 182 | 73.7% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 229 | 168 | 73.4% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 226 | 173 | 76.5% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 134 | 93 | 69.4% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 111 | 69 | 62.2% | −5.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 91 | 51 | 56.0% | −6.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 51 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 78 | 38 | 48.7% | −16.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.