Asfar
How Asfar voted in 2022
350 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ג United Torah Judaism | 41.14% 144 votes |
+35.3 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 38.29% 134 votes |
+27.4 |
| שס Shas | 14.29% 50 votes |
+6.0 |
| מחל Likud | 2.57% 9 votes |
−20.8 |
| כן National Unity | 0.29% 1 votes |
−8.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 2.86% | 10 | +1.7 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.29% | 1 | −0.0 |
| ף | הפיראטים- הכי טוב לדעתי אני רוצה להיות שם | 0.29% | 1 | +0.2 |
What happened to these votes
10 people in Asfar voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.86% here, 2.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
352 voters out of 465 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Asfar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Alumma · Yizhar · Mattityahu
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Alumma | 531 |
| Yizhar | 645 |
| Mattityahu | 374 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 388 |
| Ma'ale Amos | 324 |
| Ma'ale Levona | 351 |
| Bne Dkalim | 625 |
| Shalwa | 351 |
10 elections in Asfar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 465 | 352 | 75.7% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 398 | 284 | 71.4% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 376 | 282 | 75.0% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 371 | 278 | 74.9% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 344 | 262 | 76.2% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 248 | 187 | 75.4% | +3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 225 | 173 | 76.9% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 151 | 88 | 58.3% | −4.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 104 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 123 | 75 | 61.0% | −4.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.