Asfar
How Asfar voted in 2015
185 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 37.30% 69 votes |
+32.3 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 28.11% 52 votes |
+21.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 8.11% 15 votes |
+2.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.24% 6 votes |
−20.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.08% 2 votes |
−4.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 21.62% | 40 | +18.6 |
| נז | אחריות – לב אחד ורוח חדשה | 0.54% | 1 | +0.5 |
What happened to these votes
40 people in Asfar voted for יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 21.62% here, 7.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.97%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
187 voters out of 248 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Asfar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Tappuah · Karme Zur · Bet Hilqiyya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Tappuah | 371 |
| Karme Zur | 475 |
| Bet Hilqiyya | 328 |
| Mevo Horon | 858 |
| Itamar | 398 |
| Yizhar | 448 |
| Revava | 715 |
| Sha'alvim | 526 |
10 elections in Asfar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 465 | 352 | 75.7% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 398 | 284 | 71.4% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 376 | 282 | 75.0% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 371 | 278 | 74.9% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 344 | 262 | 76.2% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 248 | 187 | 75.4% | +3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 225 | 173 | 76.9% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 151 | 88 | 58.3% | −4.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 104 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 123 | 75 | 61.0% | −4.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.