Itamar
How Itamar voted in 2013
349 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 55.01% 192 votes |
+45.9 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.30% 22 votes |
−17.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 2.58% 9 votes |
−6.2 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת, אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.15% 4 votes |
−4.0 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 0.29% 1 votes |
−11.1 |
| מרץ מרצ - השמאל של ישראל | 0.29% 1 votes |
−4.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 32.66% | 114 | +30.9 |
| פז | כח להשפיע בהכוונת רבי אמנון יצחק | 1.15% | 4 | +0.4 |
| פץ | כולנו חברים – נ נח | 0.29% | 1 | +0.2 |
| ץ | עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם | 0.29% | 1 | −0.9 |
What happened to these votes
114 people in Itamar voted for עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 32.66% here, 18.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.76%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
349 voters out of 453 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Itamar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Talmon · Ma'ale Mikhmas · Alma
10 elections in Itamar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 676 | 492 | 72.8% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 615 | 434 | 70.6% | +3.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 592 | 442 | 74.7% | +3.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 572 | 437 | 76.4% | +6.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 573 | 449 | 78.4% | +9.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 485 | 398 | 82.1% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 453 | 349 | 77.0% | +9.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 359 | 269 | 74.9% | +12.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 227 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 205 | 163 | 79.5% | +13.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.