Haggay
How Haggay voted in 2020
262 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 68.32% 179 votes |
+63.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 21.76% 57 votes |
−7.7 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 6.11% 16 votes |
+0.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.76% 2 votes |
−6.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 3.05% | 8 | +2.6 |
What happened to these votes
8 people in Haggay voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.05% here, 7.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.42%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
262 voters out of 335 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Haggay against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bne Dkalim · Kokhav HaShahar · Brukhin
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bne Dkalim | 463 |
| Kokhav HaShahar | 1,002 |
| Brukhin | 395 |
| Mattityahu | 360 |
| Yizhar | 528 |
| Otni'el | 346 |
| Pesagot | 842 |
| Kefar Tappuah | 485 |
10 elections in Haggay
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 384 | 280 | 72.9% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 359 | 291 | 81.1% | +13.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 335 | 262 | 78.2% | +6.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 327 | 261 | 79.8% | +10.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 324 | 270 | 83.3% | +14.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 256 | 225 | 87.9% | +15.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 254 | 214 | 84.3% | +16.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 235 | 203 | 86.4% | +23.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 163 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 124 | 107 | 86.3% | +20.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.