Ani'am
How Ani'am voted in 2020
272 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 52.94% 144 votes |
+26.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 31.62% 86 votes |
+2.2 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 6.62% 18 votes |
+0.8 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 4.04% 11 votes |
−1.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.84% 5 votes |
−5.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.47% 4 votes |
−4.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.37% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.37% 1 votes |
−12.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.74% | 2 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
272 voters out of 445 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Ani'am against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Qelahim · Giv'on HaHadasha · Newe Ziv
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Qelahim | 301 |
| Giv'on HaHadasha | 706 |
| Newe Ziv | 398 |
| Bet El'azari | 823 |
| Haruzim | 434 |
| Nes Harim | 596 |
| Kefar Aviv | 411 |
| Balfurya | 329 |
10 elections in Ani'am
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 445 | 263 | 59.1% | −11.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 442 | 282 | 63.8% | −3.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 445 | 272 | 61.1% | −10.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 438 | 269 | 61.4% | −8.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 435 | 306 | 70.3% | +1.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 393 | 282 | 71.8% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 378 | 260 | 68.8% | +1.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 311 | 233 | 74.9% | +12.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 159 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 208 | 155 | 74.5% | +8.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.