Urim
How Urim voted in 2019
241 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 52.28% 126 votes |
+26.3 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 21.16% 51 votes |
+16.4 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 13.69% 33 votes |
+9.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 4.98% 12 votes |
−2.0 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 4.98% 12 votes |
−20.1 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.24% 3 votes |
−9.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.41% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 0.41% 1 votes |
−5.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.41% | 1 | +0.1 |
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.41% | 1 | −1.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
243 voters out of 442 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Urim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Lakhish · Dorot · Gan HaShomeron
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Lakhish | 463 |
| Dorot | 404 |
| Gan HaShomeron | 502 |
| Bene Ziyyon | 629 |
| Beror Hayil | 528 |
| Gevim | 351 |
| Giv'at Hayyim (Ihud) | 741 |
| Palmahim | 422 |
10 elections in Urim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 463 | 249 | 53.8% | −16.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 451 | 238 | 52.8% | −14.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 448 | 238 | 53.1% | −18.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 442 | 243 | 55.0% | −14.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 449 | 257 | 57.2% | −11.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 424 | 260 | 61.3% | −11.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 437 | 254 | 58.1% | −9.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 411 | 247 | 60.1% | −2.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 241 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 424 | 270 | 63.7% | −1.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.