Hazor-Ashdod
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as חצוראשדוד
How Hazor-Ashdod voted in 2015
446 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 46.86% 209 votes |
+28.2 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 39.24% 175 votes |
+35.3 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 7.17% 32 votes |
−1.6 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 3.14% 14 votes |
−4.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.02% 9 votes |
−21.4 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 0.22% 1 votes |
−10.4 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 0.22% 1 votes |
−6.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.22% 1 votes |
−4.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.90% | 4 | −0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
447 voters out of 628 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Hazor-Ashdod against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ya'ad · Sha'ar HaAmaqim · Amir
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ya'ad | 414 |
| Sha'ar HaAmaqim | 436 |
| Amir | 348 |
| Sha'ar HaGolan | 376 |
| Gat(Qibbuz) | 331 |
| Sasa | 338 |
| Shamir | 472 |
| Mishmarot | 365 |
10 elections in Hazor-Ashdod
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 693 | 484 | 69.8% | −0.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 669 | 477 | 71.3% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 674 | 484 | 71.8% | +0.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 665 | 451 | 67.8% | −2.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 660 | 468 | 70.9% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 628 | 447 | 71.2% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 597 | 422 | 70.7% | +2.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 603 | 425 | 70.5% | +8.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 415 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 560 | 395 | 70.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.