Daverat
How Daverat voted in 2019
216 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 66.67% 144 votes |
+40.7 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 12.96% 28 votes |
+8.2 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.48% 14 votes |
−18.6 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 5.09% 11 votes |
+0.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 4.17% 9 votes |
−2.8 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 1.85% 4 votes |
−4.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.39% 3 votes |
−6.1 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.46% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יק | מפלגת הגוש התנ"כי | 0.46% | 1 | +0.5 |
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.46% | 1 | −1.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
217 voters out of 313 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Daverat against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Zerufa · Irus · Geva'ot Bar
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Zerufa | 533 |
| Irus | 324 |
| Geva'ot Bar | 477 |
| Ne'ot Mordekhay | 348 |
| Shafir | 436 |
| En Ya'aqov | 549 |
| Giv'at Ye'arim | 713 |
| Giv'on HaHadasha | 698 |
10 elections in Daverat
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 372 | 258 | 69.4% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 347 | 253 | 72.9% | +5.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 327 | 230 | 70.3% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 313 | 217 | 69.3% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 302 | 206 | 68.2% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 235 | 163 | 69.4% | −3.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 248 | 182 | 73.4% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 248 | 161 | 64.9% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 170 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 248 | 168 | 67.7% | +2.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.