Qelahim
How Qelahim voted in 2020
301 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 35.22% 106 votes |
+5.8 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 31.89% 96 votes |
+5.3 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 19.60% 59 votes |
+13.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 6.64% 20 votes |
−1.0 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 4.65% 14 votes |
−0.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.00% 3 votes |
−4.7 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.33% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.33% 1 votes |
−12.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.33% | 1 | −0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
301 voters out of 365 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Qelahim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Newe Ziv · Giv'on HaHadasha · Bet El'azari
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Newe Ziv | 398 |
| Giv'on HaHadasha | 706 |
| Bet El'azari | 823 |
| Nes Harim | 596 |
| Haruzim | 434 |
| Ma'or | 709 |
| Kefar Aviv | 411 |
| Balfurya | 329 |
10 elections in Qelahim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 383 | 299 | 78.1% | +7.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 373 | 279 | 74.8% | +7.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 365 | 301 | 82.5% | +10.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 357 | 286 | 80.1% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 350 | 291 | 83.1% | +14.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 323 | 250 | 77.4% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 289 | 213 | 73.7% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 219 | 147 | 67.1% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 134 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 202 | 127 | 62.9% | −2.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.