Majdal Shams
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as מגדל שמס
How Majdal Shams voted in 2013
103 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 69.90% 72 votes |
+46.6 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 7.77% 8 votes |
−6.6 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 7.77% 8 votes |
−1.0 |
| צפ התנועה בראשות ציפי לבני | 6.80% 7 votes |
+1.8 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 3.88% 4 votes |
−7.5 |
| מרץ מרצ - השמאל של ישראל | 1.94% 2 votes |
−2.6 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת - התנועה הערבית להתחדשות – המפלגה העקבית הדמוקרטית | 0.97% 1 votes |
−2.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| צק | צדק חברתי בראשות גד הרן | 0.97% | 1 | +0.9 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
103 voters out of 505 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Majdal Shams against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Rumat Heib · Reihaniyye · Nes Harim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Rumat Heib | 357 |
| Reihaniyye | 415 |
| Nes Harim | 377 |
| Kerem Maharal | 428 |
| Ramot Me'ir | 366 |
| Barqay | 308 |
| Ramat Zevi | 308 |
| Ya'ara | 328 |
10 elections in Majdal Shams
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 1,338 | 313 | 23.4% | −47.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 962 | 169 | 17.6% | −49.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 900 | 164 | 18.2% | −53.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 867 | 175 | 20.2% | −49.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 801 | 139 | 17.4% | −51.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 580 | 114 | 19.7% | −52.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 505 | 103 | 20.4% | −47.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 388 | 81 | 20.9% | −41.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 95 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 256 | 103 | 40.2% | −25.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.