Mevo Hamma
How Mevo Hamma voted in 2020
266 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 66.17% 176 votes |
+39.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 23.68% 63 votes |
+17.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 4.89% 13 votes |
−24.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.26% 6 votes |
−3.5 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 1.13% 3 votes |
−4.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.75% 2 votes |
−6.9 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.38% 1 votes |
−12.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ני | קמ"ה – קידום מעמד הפרט | 0.38% | 1 | +0.4 |
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.38% | 1 | −0.0 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
266 voters out of 402 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Mevo Hamma against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Shadmot Devora · Ziqim · Gan Shelomo
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Shadmot Devora | 383 |
| Ziqim | 489 |
| Gan Shelomo | 323 |
| Lahavot Haviva | 469 |
| Tal Shahar | 614 |
| Kammon | 396 |
| Zofit | 597 |
| Sede Warburg | 732 |
10 elections in Mevo Hamma
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 409 | 268 | 65.5% | −5.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 409 | 281 | 68.7% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 402 | 266 | 66.2% | −5.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 400 | 274 | 68.5% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 401 | 283 | 70.6% | +2.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 345 | 242 | 70.1% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 347 | 220 | 63.4% | −4.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 332 | 201 | 60.5% | −2.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 178 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 303 | 165 | 54.5% | −11.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.