Kefar Gallim
How Kefar Gallim voted in 2003
50 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 34.00% 17 votes |
+4.6 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 22.00% 11 votes |
+7.5 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 20.00% 10 votes |
+7.7 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 6.00% 3 votes |
+1.8 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 6.00% 3 votes |
+0.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| רק | הירוקים | 8.00% | 4 | +7.6 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 4.00% | 2 | +2.8 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Kefar Gallim voted for הירוקים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 8.00% here, 19.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.41%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
50 voters out of 83 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kefar Gallim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet She'arim · Hazerim · Allonim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet She'arim | 313 |
| Hazerim | 524 |
| Allonim | 346 |
| Sarid | 428 |
| Kabri | 514 |
| Kefar Azza | 365 |
| Ramat HaShofet | 320 |
| Bet Lehem HaGelilit | 312 |
10 elections in Kefar Gallim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 116 | 68 | 58.6% | −12.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 106 | 58 | 54.7% | −12.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 94 | 49 | 52.1% | −19.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 98 | 59 | 60.2% | −9.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 89 | 61 | 68.5% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 84 | 60 | 71.4% | −0.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 83 | 56 | 67.5% | −0.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 79 | 50 | 63.3% | +0.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 59 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 83 | 50 | 60.2% | −5.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.