Newe Ativ
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as נווה אטיב
How Newe Ativ voted in 2009
101 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 43.56% 44 votes |
+21.1 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 31.68% 32 votes |
+10.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 11.88% 12 votes |
+0.2 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 5.94% 6 votes |
−4.0 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 2.97% 3 votes |
−0.4 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 0.99% 1 votes |
−1.9 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 0.99% 1 votes |
−2.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.99% | 1 | +0.6 |
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 0.99% | 1 | +0.6 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
101 voters out of 152 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Newe Ativ against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Netiv HaAsara · Me'ona · Bet Yehoshua
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Netiv HaAsara | 414 |
| Me'ona | 344 |
| Bet Yehoshua | 476 |
| Tel Yizhaq | 501 |
| Lakhish | 332 |
| Gannot Hadar | 403 |
| Mabbu'im | 447 |
| Dan | 300 |
10 elections in Newe Ativ
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 180 | 96 | 53.3% | −17.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 175 | 105 | 60.0% | −7.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 163 | 98 | 60.1% | −11.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 164 | 99 | 60.4% | −9.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 165 | 111 | 67.3% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 154 | 110 | 71.4% | −0.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 147 | 108 | 73.5% | +5.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 152 | 101 | 66.4% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 91 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 129 | 83 | 64.3% | −1.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.