Sheluhot
How Sheluhot voted in 2019
256 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 50.39% 129 votes |
+44.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 19.53% 50 votes |
−5.6 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 15.62% 40 votes |
−10.3 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 8.98% 23 votes |
+4.2 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.95% 5 votes |
−4.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.78% 2 votes |
−6.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.39% 1 votes |
−6.6 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 0.39% 1 votes |
−3.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 1.56% | 4 | −0.3 |
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.39% | 1 | +0.1 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Sheluhot voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.56% here, 0.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.88%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
257 voters out of 356 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Sheluhot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Sheluhot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 342 | 241 | 70.5% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 339 | 246 | 72.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 354 | 258 | 72.9% | +1.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 356 | 257 | 72.2% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 362 | 277 | 76.5% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 385 | 284 | 73.8% | +1.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 394 | 289 | 73.4% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 386 | 265 | 68.7% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 268 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 362 | 260 | 71.8% | +6.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.