Har'el
How Har'el voted in 2015
104 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 42.31% 44 votes |
+23.6 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 27.88% 29 votes |
+24.0 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 13.46% 14 votes |
+4.6 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 5.77% 6 votes |
−1.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.88% 3 votes |
−2.2 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.88% 3 votes |
−20.5 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 1.92% 2 votes |
−8.7 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 1.92% 2 votes |
−4.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| רק | הירוקים | 0.96% | 1 | +0.9 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
104 voters out of 199 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Har'el against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar HaNasi · Geva · Nir Yizhaq
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar HaNasi | 404 |
| Geva | 387 |
| Nir Yizhaq | 381 |
| Sha'ar HaAmaqim | 436 |
| Ya'ad | 414 |
| Hazor-Ashdod | 446 |
| Amir | 348 |
| Sha'ar HaGolan | 376 |
10 elections in Har'el
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 236 | 127 | 53.8% | −16.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 220 | 119 | 54.1% | −13.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 220 | 120 | 54.5% | −17.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 220 | 120 | 54.5% | −15.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 221 | 121 | 54.8% | −13.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 199 | 104 | 52.3% | −20.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 185 | 91 | 49.2% | −18.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 147 | 62 | 42.2% | −20.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 69 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 140 | 59 | 42.1% | −23.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.