Dahi
How Dahi voted in 2015
256 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 90.23% 231 votes |
+79.6 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 3.12% 8 votes |
−0.8 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 2.73% 7 votes |
−15.9 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.78% 2 votes |
−4.2 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 0.39% 1 votes |
−7.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 0.39% 1 votes |
−23.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ע | הרשימה הערבית | 1.95% | 5 | +1.9 |
| נץ | פרח – שפע, ברכה, חיים ושלום – נץ המהפך בחינוך, דיור ושלום אמת | 0.39% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Dahi voted for הרשימה הערבית. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.95% here, 19.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.10%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
259 voters out of 429 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Dahi against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Al-Hawashila · Abu Juway'ad · Sandala
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Al-Hawashila | 515 |
| Abu Juway'ad | 306 |
| Sandala | 744 |
| Hamam | 501 |
| Aramsha | 434 |
| Tayibe(Baemeq) | 619 |
| Qasr A-Sir | 353 |
| Umm Batin | 589 |
10 elections in Dahi
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 546 | 218 | 39.9% | −30.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 529 | 106 | 20.0% | −47.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 511 | 292 | 57.1% | −14.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 500 | 269 | 53.8% | −16.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 491 | 136 | 27.7% | −40.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 429 | 259 | 60.4% | −12.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 388 | 151 | 38.9% | −28.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 355 | 143 | 40.3% | −22.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 137 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 310 | 73 | 23.5% | −42.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.