Kaokab Abu Al-Hija
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as כאוכב אבו אל-היג' · כאוכב אבו אלהיגא
How Kaokab Abu Al-Hija voted in 2015
1,758 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 97.44% 1,713 votes |
+86.8 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 1.65% 29 votes |
−2.3 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 0.23% 4 votes |
−7.3 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 0.11% 2 votes |
−18.6 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 0.11% 2 votes |
−6.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 0.11% 2 votes |
−23.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.06% 1 votes |
−5.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ע | הרשימה הערבית | 0.23% | 4 | +0.1 |
| ףץ | Unsourced | 0.06% | 1 | −0.0 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
1,768 voters out of 2,253 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Kaokab Abu Al-Hija against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Al-Hawashila · Sulam · Mi'elya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Al-Hawashila | 515 |
| Sulam | 1,324 |
| Mi'elya | 1,745 |
| Deir Al-Asad | 5,668 |
| Hamam | 501 |
| Sandala | 744 |
| Umm Batin | 589 |
| Daburiyya | 4,504 |
10 elections in Kaokab Abu Al-Hija
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 2,804 | 1,721 | 61.4% | −9.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 2,712 | 1,522 | 56.1% | −11.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 2,632 | 2,132 | 81.0% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 2,607 | 2,054 | 78.8% | +8.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 2,559 | 1,626 | 63.5% | −4.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 2,253 | 1,768 | 78.5% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 2,119 | 1,411 | 66.6% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 1,901 | 1,478 | 77.7% | +15.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 1,381 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 1,637 | 1,344 | 82.1% | +16.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.