Shezor
How Shezor voted in 2022
214 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 58.88% 126 votes |
+35.5 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 14.49% 31 votes |
+3.6 |
| כן National Unity | 9.35% 20 votes |
+0.3 |
| שס Shas | 6.54% 14 votes |
−1.7 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 5.61% 12 votes |
−12.2 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 1.40% 3 votes |
−4.5 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 1.40% 3 votes |
−3.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| צ | צעירים בוערים בהנהגת הדר מוכתר | 0.93% | 2 | +0.7 |
| ני | נתיב - נחיה תמיד יחד בכבוד | 0.47% | 1 | +0.4 |
| קנ | כל קול קובע נועם קולמן ולירון עופרי לראשות הממשלה | 0.47% | 1 | +0.4 |
| ת | דעת טוב ורע וברית שבט אברהם-עלה ירוק ואוסרת אל איס | 0.47% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
214 voters out of 274 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Shezor against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Tifrah · Nir Gallim · Alma
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Tifrah | 944 |
| Nir Gallim | 522 |
| Alma | 458 |
| Bne Netsarim | 308 |
| Pattish | 576 |
| Azriqam | 777 |
| Karme Zur | 428 |
| Suseya | 596 |
10 elections in Shezor
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 274 | 214 | 78.1% | +7.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 278 | 194 | 69.8% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 279 | 217 | 77.8% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 279 | 193 | 69.2% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 272 | 188 | 69.1% | +0.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 261 | 199 | 76.2% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 263 | 174 | 66.2% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 242 | 156 | 64.5% | +2.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 159 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 226 | 153 | 67.7% | +2.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.