Ein Al-Asad
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as עין אלאסד
How Ein Al-Asad voted in 2009
233 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 30.90% 72 votes |
+9.3 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 26.61% 62 votes |
+16.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 18.88% 44 votes |
+7.2 |
| ד אלתג'מוע אלוטני אלדמוקרטי – בל"ד | 10.73% 25 votes |
+8.2 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 9.44% 22 votes |
−13.0 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 1.29% 3 votes |
−3.1 |
| ו חד"ש החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ושיוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור ערבים ויהודים) | 0.86% 2 votes |
−2.5 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 0.86% 2 votes |
−2.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ק | דעם – מפלגת פועלים בראשות אסמא אגבארייה זחאלקה | 0.43% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
235 voters out of 517 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Ein Al-Asad against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kafar Kama · Fassuta · Reihaniyye
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kafar Kama | 499 |
| Fassuta | 800 |
| Reihaniyye | 441 |
| Zor'a | 503 |
| Segev-Shalom | 1,163 |
| Nir Yizhaq | 356 |
| Ga'ash | 388 |
| Merhavya(Moshav) | 387 |
10 elections in Ein Al-Asad
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 685 | 328 | 47.9% | −22.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 647 | 292 | 45.1% | −22.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 639 | 350 | 54.8% | −16.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 630 | 348 | 55.2% | −14.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 619 | 322 | 52.0% | −16.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 571 | 281 | 49.2% | −23.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 559 | 230 | 41.1% | −26.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 517 | 235 | 45.5% | −17.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 308 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 437 | 246 | 56.3% | −9.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.