Nogah
How Nogah voted in 2022
323 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 44.89% 145 votes |
+21.5 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 17.96% 58 votes |
+7.1 |
| כן National Unity | 12.69% 41 votes |
+3.6 |
| שס Shas | 10.53% 34 votes |
+2.3 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 8.98% 29 votes |
−8.8 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 1.55% 5 votes |
−2.9 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.93% 3 votes |
−2.8 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 0.31% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.62% | 2 | −0.6 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.62% | 2 | +0.3 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 0.62% | 2 | −2.5 |
| זץ | צומת בראשות משה גרין דרכו של רפול | 0.31% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
324 voters out of 435 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Nogah against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Pa'ame Tashaz · Yad Rambam · Yagel
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Pa'ame Tashaz | 308 |
| Yad Rambam | 671 |
| Yagel | 513 |
| Kefar Ahim | 411 |
| Bene Darom | 441 |
| Tene | 416 |
| Dolev | 692 |
| Bet Shiqma | 421 |
10 elections in Nogah
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 435 | 324 | 74.5% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 413 | 274 | 66.3% | −1.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 409 | 297 | 72.6% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 407 | 279 | 68.6% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 399 | 286 | 71.7% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 380 | 278 | 73.2% | +0.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 360 | 221 | 61.4% | −6.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 317 | 176 | 55.5% | −7.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 178 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 310 | 194 | 62.6% | −3.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.