Nogah
How Nogah voted in 2009
176 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 38.07% 67 votes |
+16.5 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 27.84% 49 votes |
+17.9 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 9.09% 16 votes |
−13.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 7.39% 13 votes |
−4.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 4.55% 8 votes |
−3.9 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 3.98% 7 votes |
+1.1 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 1.70% 3 votes |
−1.2 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 0.57% 1 votes |
−2.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| חי | ישראל חזקה בראשות ד"ר אפרים סנה | 4.55% | 8 | +4.3 |
| ץ | צומת - התנועה לציונות מתחדשת | 1.14% | 2 | +1.1 |
| זך | גיל – גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 0.57% | 1 | +0.0 |
| צי | צבר – מפלגת הצעירים של ישראל | 0.57% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
8 people in Nogah voted for ישראל חזקה בראשות ד"ר אפרים סנה. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.55% here, 22.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.20%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
176 voters out of 317 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Nogah against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Nogah
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 435 | 324 | 74.5% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 413 | 274 | 66.3% | −1.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 409 | 297 | 72.6% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 407 | 279 | 68.6% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 399 | 286 | 71.7% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 380 | 278 | 73.2% | +0.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 360 | 221 | 61.4% | −6.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 317 | 176 | 55.5% | −7.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 178 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 310 | 194 | 62.6% | −3.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.