Shedema
How Shedema voted in 2021
286 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 30.07% 86 votes |
+16.1 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 18.18% 52 votes |
+12.1 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 17.13% 49 votes |
+10.5 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 15.03% 43 votes |
+10.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.04% 23 votes |
−16.2 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 5.94% 17 votes |
+1.2 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 1.75% 5 votes |
−4.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.75% 5 votes |
−3.9 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 1.05% 3 votes |
−4.1 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, תע"ל, בל"ד) | 0.35% 1 votes |
−4.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.70% | 2 | −0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
286 voters out of 382 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Shedema against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Na'an · Qoranit · Kefar Yehoshua
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Na'an | 998 |
| Qoranit | 491 |
| Kefar Yehoshua | 657 |
| Hilla | 335 |
| Gazit | 467 |
| Nahalal | 583 |
| Shadmot Devora | 384 |
| Revivim | 437 |
10 elections in Shedema
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 384 | 278 | 72.4% | +1.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 382 | 286 | 74.9% | +7.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 381 | 277 | 72.7% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 382 | 293 | 76.7% | +6.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 390 | 295 | 75.6% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 353 | 278 | 78.8% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 324 | 240 | 74.1% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 307 | 217 | 70.7% | +8.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 212 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 282 | 198 | 70.2% | +4.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.